From: daw@delhi.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 35e90e91523b1785fcf655562ca09e29bab28e5a8b66817617ff5eb8fd655da1
Message ID: <199511122205.RAA24984@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-14 12:28:26 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:28:26 +0800
From: daw@delhi.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:28:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: coding and nnet's
Message-ID: <199511122205.RAA24984@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <199511111800.NAA23831@jekyll.piermont.com>,
Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps neural nets could be used in an unknown plain text, brute force
> > attack to automatically select possible decryptions for human examination.
> > I don't know of any papers on the subject.
>
> I remember seeing a good paper by our own David Wagner on how to do
> this without anything more than some ordinary statistics -- no
> complicated junk required. David, if you are reading this, could you
> comment?
>
Check out
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/recog.ps
for a paper by Steve Bellovin & me on doing plaintext recognition
with ordinary statistics.
It has nothing to do with neural networks, though....
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMKZvoCoZzwIn1bdtAQHItQGA1jD4SjC1Vg1fwCO3VLJ7v+gUlUvncwhj
v2SwPURAjry2QAeWBNeL5hMJARQuQHNx
=Cepa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to November 1995
Return to “daw@delhi.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)”
1995-11-14 (Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:28:26 +0800) - Re: coding and nnet’s - daw@delhi.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David A Wagner)