1995-11-14 - Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.

Header Data

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Message Hash: 3652786b2102817a8757f3e0c0355f8db61b3b45442739d783e8f065a2e8fcb3
Message ID: <9511141920.AA13573@sulphur.osf.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-14 19:52:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 03:52:00 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 03:52:00 +0800
To: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Subject: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
Message-ID: <9511141920.AA13573@sulphur.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


As I said in my original message about Pegasus:
	The NSA consider this kind of thing "crypto with a hole"
	It's stupid, the hole is the crypto.  But, the rest of
	the code is considered by the Agency to be an "ancilliary
	device" as defined under ITAR.

Thread

• Return to November 1995

• Return to “Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>”
• Return to “Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>”

• Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”

• 1995-11-14 (Wed, 15 Nov 1995 03:52:00 +0800) - Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks. - Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
  • 1995-11-14 (Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:26:30 +0800) - Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks. - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
    • 1995-11-14 (Wed, 15 Nov 1995 05:29:36 +0800) - Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks. - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>