1995-11-09 - Re: Mime/multipart (was Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security)

Header Data

From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
Message Hash: 58e69b6963fed83bd5d740aeb788be2b2b28504617e55379837e146f3c7015c5
Message ID: <v03003b18acc7d3c77b54@[204.118.88.32]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-09 16:43:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:43:57 +0800

Raw message

From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:43:57 +0800
To: Laurent Demailly <dl@hplyot.obspm.fr>
Subject: Re: Mime/multipart (was Re: PGP Comment feature weakens remailer security)
Message-ID: <v03003b18acc7d3c77b54@[204.118.88.32]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 5:56 AM 11/9/95, Laurent Demailly wrote:
>I've waited a bit, but as nobody seem to have pointed out, you can
>definitly find a unique stream in a *single* pass (but maybe what you
>really want is no pass at all ?)

	engineering versus math.

	you can do it in zero passes, sort of.

	Generate a heafty pseudorandom number and convert it to a heafty
ascii string.  What are the odds that that string will appear in ANY kind
of data you are generating?  Low.  Measured in years and probably decades.

	As you do the mime encapsulation, also scan for a collision.  When
you get it (once every 20 years or so), abort the processing and start over.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                                +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                                fax:  +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                     dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Sunnyvale, CA  94086 USA                         http://www.brandenburg.com







Thread