1995-11-13 - Re: Pegasus Mail 2.20

Header Data

From: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5a6579ff7cd3c28b4582b175fe8242ee535bec5ae3172b562a02131a2498f8e4
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951113115956.13040D-100000@ima.net>
Reply To: <199511090804.CAA20494@ion1.ionet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-13 04:33:10 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:33:10 +0800

Raw message

From: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:33:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Pegasus Mail 2.20
In-Reply-To: <199511090804.CAA20494@ion1.ionet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951113115956.13040D-100000@ima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 9 Nov 1995, Scott Staedeli wrote:

[David Harris:]
[...]
> will define an open interface for third-party encryptors and it is then
> up to other people to write the code. What I envisage actually happening
> is people writing "shell interfaces" for WinPMail - i.e., modules that
> take the calls I make and translate them into calls to other programs,
> such as PGP or whatever, returning the result.

Is anybody currently writing modules for PGP (or, less trivially, for
MOSS, S/MIME etc.)? I've had a look at the interface and it doesn't seem
difficult, but why re-invent the wheel? :-)
The real question for PGP, actually, is which scheme should be supported
to achieve MIME compatibility among the several proposed in the IETF
drafts. 






Thread