1995-11-22 - Re: Java & Netscape security [NOISE]

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5ef27b3c7d2b578d3b39dd55c9da2d5e895c5be0e54d56a6a34ed22302024644
Message ID: <i6uyeD4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199511221048.CAA26409@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-22 12:10:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Nov 95 04:10:13 PST

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 95 04:10:13 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Java & Netscape security [NOISE]
In-Reply-To: <199511221048.CAA26409@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <i6uyeD4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Alice de Nonymous writes:
> What I'm trying to say is that if someome posts from watson.ibm.com,
> and IF they are talking about OS/2, we will not accept that they are
> not speaking independantly of the knowledge they have garnered from
> watson.

I fully agree. I'm not arguing with you.

> In the same way, someone who writes from Netscape.com or AT&T, or Sun
> and tries to disclaim that they are speaking for the company, when
> they step out as an employee of a company is deluding themselves.

If you meant "disclaim that they are NOT speaking for the company", then that's
what I was saying too. Moreover, I think that if someone known to work for Sun
posts from Netcom about Sun products, policies, and future plans, s/he'll have
both higher credibility and higher responsibility to the readers than a
proverbial person from the street.

(Sorry for not being able to take this to e-mail.)

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread