From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 7535931146e73dc4b23148aa943f620d939b49519860d43fe9b25d90e011d0d9
Message ID: <199511050039.QAA02014@ix9.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-05 00:52:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 08:52:34 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995 08:52:34 +0800
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: on topic!!
Message-ID: <199511050039.QAA02014@ix9.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 02:17 PM 11/4/95 -0800, VZNuri wrote:
>if there were two key elements here, these conversations would probably
>largely go away (instead of continually reappear)
>- an unambiguous charter
>- an active moderator
>
>unfortunately I suspect that a moderator does exist but he "prefers
>to remain anonymous" ("pseudonymous"?). imho that is precisely
>how *not* to succeed as a moderator.
As an alternative, there was the Cypherwonks list, which worked just that
way, and such conversations did rapidly go away :-)
What's evolved here instead are a couple of filtered lists,
such as cp-lite, where you can get the conversations that
one or another monitor considers relevant instead of the whole firehose.
It seems to work reasonably well for a lot of people.
#---
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, Freelance Information Architect, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# Phone +1-510-247-0664 Pager/Voicemail 1-408-787-1281
#---
Return to November 1995
Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
1995-11-05 (Sun, 5 Nov 1995 08:52:34 +0800) - Re: on topic!! - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>