From: amp <Alan.Pugh@internetMCI.COM>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 22:30:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
Message-ID: <01HY7L3OU4XE922UYW@MAIL-CLUSTER.PCY.MCI.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-- [ From: amp * EMC.Ver #2.3 ] --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: Jack P. Starrantino      \ Internet:    (jps@monad.semcor.com)

JS> I bring nothing cypher-wise. I would be willing to help walk the
JS> s/w-engineering dog and to write Motif/X/socket if the chosen platform
JS> is UN*X, however.

JS> So, from an engineering standpoint, what should the "future" look
JS> like?

unfortunately, it appears to me that if you _really_ want encryption
to be universal, it's gotta be done on windoze, it's gotta be
point-n-click and seamless to the mail application. i would prefer it
if the masses would use a real operating system, (no o/s wars please.
i started in a mini/mainframe environment and simply don't think
dos/windoze qualify your mileage may vary), but that just ain't the
way it is. would netscape be selling at $130+ if they only wrote for
unix?

my 2 cents


amp
<0003701548@mcimail.com> (since 10/31/88)
<alan.pugh@internetmci.com>
PGP Key = 57957C9D
PGP FP = FA 02 84 7D 82 57 78 E4  E2 1C 7B 88 62 A6 F9 F7 
November 29, 1995   17:40
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMLzhU4dTfgZXlXydAQEC1gf+ImAvGk2ceQqCt8E0EC9rlFwrMgEmgkZk
E+mBd88dB8TazZn1n7oXasjc0GIjMZZCQYft9gqzuQDLQ6ceK5MpIZuREFWJq6+U
nyvq/ivkiGwB4ubZ48xG4EJS8094C+Xj4fG/zgtNVsQr0O6ln/6Q/+bt/ciqP9PZ
4gjP4VYpmiFEQ3OGW/oYevmAxdvYYRoWEfjUwmG8tHKORWo9yfDs9yJHHYo3StmX
SqM47v2F3D1r5JBgdrrIdOElwJHchU31kwk7trDs0/Ne7HWDdgIsX2MoDCW/Dwdt
SaTC3B5TVpz6G/+FvxUSRWgY5vU1sqnCT5WogqTfJRP5ohz5rt6nqQ==
=IB4/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----