From: “BITNET POSTMASTER” <POSTMAST@MVS.MEDCTR.UCLA.EDU>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 8288636247cb05acd3469b2a40373a2585869b47d00fde60323d7b9351a17e55
Message ID: <X5306122746>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-02 23:46:49 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 07:46:49 +0800
From: "BITNET POSTMASTER" <POSTMAST@MVS.MEDCTR.UCLA.EDU>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 07:46:49 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Reply to ERROR: MAX RETRIES E
Message-ID: <X5306122746>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
*** Sent by Alternate User "LM#LK" for "POSTMAST" ***
*** Original Author: DRESCHS @ TANDEM - ** Remote User **; 11/02/95 12:27
>Message ID: X5306122746 WAS FORWARDED BY POSTMASTER@MGMT
>Original sender: DRESCHS @TANDEM
>
>Received: from relay3.UU.NET by MVS.MEDCTR.UCLA.EDU (IBM MVS SMTP V2R2.1)
> with TCP; Thu, 02 Nov 95 12:27:32 PDT
>Received: from toad.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP
> id QQzodt13430; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 15:16:35 -0500 (EST)
>Received: by toad.com id AA12091; Thu, 2 Nov 95 11:58:50 PST
>Received: from devnull (devnull.mpd.tandem.com) by toad.com id AA12085; Thu, 2
> Nov 95 11:58:42 PST
>Received: from galil.austnsc.tandem.com. by devnull (8.6.8/8.6.6)
> id NAA03606; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 13:58:28 -0600
>Received: (from dreschs@localhost) by galil.austnsc.tandem.com. (8.7.1/8.7.1) i
> OAA09507; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 14:00:32 -0600 (CST)
>Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 14:00:32 -0600 (CST)
>From: Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
>Message-Id: <199511022000.OAA09507@galil.austnsc.tandem.com.>
>To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
>Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
>In-Reply-To: sameer's message of Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:10:43 -0800 (PST)
>Subject: Re: censored? corrected Steve Pizzo cited in The Spotlight
>References: <199511021624.KAA05751@galil.austnsc.tandem.com.>
> <199511021810.KAA14547@infinity.c2.org>
>Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
>Precedence: bulk
>
sameer <sameer@c2.org> said:
>> Is it? This is the _one_ thing in the article (is that term giving
>> it too much legitimacy?) that I whought was barely true. Whoever
>> controls the root level DNS servers effectively controls the
>> Internet. I postulated a couple of months ago about how the US Govt
>> might attempt to censor the rest of the world: "Remove
>> lurid.porno.site.other-country from your DNS system within 72 hours
>> or we will remove references to your DNS servers from the root level
>> servers.". (I also speculated that if the US Govt tried doing this,
>> that an 'underground' DNS system would form almost immediately.)
>>
s> The US govt. doesn't run the root nameservers, nor are all the
s> root nameservers within US jurisdiction.
Granted, the US Govt doesn't run the US-based root servers.
But, if an Internet 'Decency' law was passed, they certainly could try
to threaten the US-based root server maintainers to make the cascading
threats. And, as I understand the way DNS resolution works, address
requests go down to your root domain then up from the other root domain,
i.e., for me to find out what c2.org's address is, my system requests
from:
NS mpd.tandem.com
NS tandem.com
NS com
NS org
If this is correct, if the com NS has the entry for the org NS, I won't
be able to resolve those names. Of course, explicit IP addresses and
*** Comments From: POSTMAST - POSTMASTER, BITNET; 11/02/95 12:54
Can someone please tell me how to remove/unsubscribe an email address
from this mail list. I need the exact commands. Apparently someone
subscribed to this list using an invalid email address and all the mail
messages are neding up in a bounced mail file. We need to get this
email address unsubscribed. Thank you for your help.
Postmaster
mvs.medctr.ucla.edu
Return to November 1995
Return to ““BITNET POSTMASTER” <POSTMAST@MVS.MEDCTR.UCLA.EDU>”
1995-11-02 (Fri, 3 Nov 1995 07:46:49 +0800) - Reply to ERROR: MAX RETRIES E - “BITNET POSTMASTER” <POSTMAST@MVS.MEDCTR.UCLA.EDU>