From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: “Tom Bell” <BELL@odo.law.udayton.edu>
Message Hash: 85a2227d3ffbb03beb99147526f1b73b0a6220e3102bdc3b060fa146a1d29ab5
Message ID: <9510302258.AA00471@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-02 01:29:16 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:29:16 +0800
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:29:16 +0800
To: "Tom Bell" <BELL@odo.law.udayton.edu>
Subject: Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act
Message-ID: <9510302258.AA00471@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> S. 1284, s1201: "No person shall import, manufacture or distribute
> any device, product, or component incorporated into a device or
> product, or offer or perform any service, the primary purpose or
> effect of which is to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or otherwise
> circumvent, without the authority of the copyright owner or the
> law, any process, treatement, mechanism or system which prevents
> or inhibits the violation of any of the exclusive rights of the
> copyright owner under section 106."
IANAL, but I thought these types of laws were already tested and deemed
unconstitutional in cases involving video-tape copying boxes, dual video
cassette dubbing decks, SCMS 'scrubbers', etc...
andrew
Return to November 1995
Return to “Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>”
1995-11-02 (Thu, 2 Nov 1995 09:29:16 +0800) - Re: S. 1284 To Amend (C) Act - Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>