From: “James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8feef8a95b183de41e3623f384bf1ec073c7611bd730ba9987ef0634c5706b99
Message ID: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951128000018.20981B-100000@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-28 08:32:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 16:32:30 +0800
From: "James M. Cobb" <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 16:32:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Privacy Right in UK ? - Part 2
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951128000018.20981B-100000@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Friend,
11 27 95 Press Association News in the UK reports:
STORM AS SPY CAMERA `JUICY BITS' SET FOR SALE
"Furious MPs are demanding action," cries the story. Why?
Their anger follows a row over the sale in video shops of
"juicy bits" from closed circuit TV cameras fixed in high
streets and stores to detect crime.
High streets: where the fashionable retail shops are.
One extract showed a couple having sex in a doorway,
unaware they were being watched.
It wasn't me, Mums, I swear!
A Liberal Democrat family spokeswoman:
"That this sale has been allowed is a disgrace and will
undermine the trust the public has in cameras designed
to cut crime."
A Labour MP:
"This situation plainly leaves people wide open to black-
mail."
He said "some of his constituents in Linlithgow had recently
been compromised by such a video."
A sly dog at the Home Office:
"We have not seen the video [good move!], but judging from
what has been said about it, it would have to be classified
by the British Board of Film Classification if it is being sold."
If we don't have privacy, we do have censorship!
But Mums, I swear...
Cordially,
Jim
NOTE. The Press Association website's URL:
http://www.pa.press.net
The newsstory's online filename: pick8.html.
Return to November 1995
Return to ““James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>”
1995-11-28 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 16:32:30 +0800) - No Privacy Right in UK ? - Part 2 - “James M. Cobb” <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>