From: “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>
To: John Curtis <jbell@capecod.net>
Message Hash: 9c0e04c63d68060da1c4fa78c9deac10239e76167a3359ce1fd78350891365ab
Message ID: <199511081549.JAA28561@cdale1.midwest.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-09 00:19:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:19:58 +0800
From: "David E. Smith" <dsmith@midwest.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:19:58 +0800
To: John Curtis <jbell@capecod.net>
Subject: Re: expiration dates on cryptography
Message-ID: <199511081549.JAA28561@cdale1.midwest.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:21 AM 11/8/95 -0500, John Curtis wrote:
>Given that trust is often of an ephemeral nature, it would be
>quite useful to set time limits on secrets. Would it be possible
>to cryptographically protect a secret such that it could not be
>decrypted after a certain time?
It's a nice idea, really. The problem is - how do you verify the
absolute time? For instance, by resetting a PC's internal clock
you can instantly circumvent that measure. Possibly by forcing
the application to consult a "reliable" clock like one of the
cesium clocks, but that could be hacked.
Unless you can absolutely, reliably, and without fear/danger of
being hacked around, verify the correct time, self-destruct crypto
probably won't happen.
----- David E. Smith, dsmith@midwest.net, PGP ID 0x92732139
http://www.midwest.net/scribers/dsmith
Return to November 1995
Return to ““David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>”
1995-11-09 (Thu, 9 Nov 1995 08:19:58 +0800) - Re: expiration dates on cryptography - “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>