From: JMKELSEY@delphi.com
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 16:08:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: wiretaping ability and future plans
Message-ID: <01HX6STU0B649AO7EU@delphi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1995 01:55:06 -0800
>From: Jay Campbell <edge@got.net>
>Subject: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system

>FBI seeks huge wiretapping system
>BY JOHN MARKOFF
>New York Times

>``These are staggering numbers,'' said Mark Rasch, director of
>information security law and policy for Science Applications
>International Corp. in McLean, Va. ``Either they do a lot more
>wiretaps than they now admit, or they plan on doing a significant
>larger number of wiretaps in the future because of the fear of
>domestic terrorism.''

I can see at least two possible alternative explanations:

1.   The FBI envisions a time when voice-recognition systems will be
cheap enough to do "keyword searches" on digital voice in something
close to real time, with high accuracy.  This might be useful when
fishing for crime, dissent, etc.  It would certainly require some
rather broader powers, but they may expect this, especially if they
expect more acts of domestic and foreign terrorism.

2.   After implementing some kind of widespread escrowed crypto, the
FBI envisions recording lots of encrypted phone conversations,
perhaps targeted on suspiscious people, perhaps random.  Since the
whole conversation is encrypted, this might not violate any laws,
since they still have to get the warrant to recover the
conversation.  This would get them past the obvious practical
problem with most wiretap-based investigations--if you start your
wiretap three days after the target becomes a suspect, you've
probably missed all the juicy stuff.  Only a bit of carelessness or
stupidity on the part of your target will get the desired
information.

>   Jay Campbell                edge@got.net - Operations Manager
>   -=-=-=-=-=-=-               Sense Networking, Santa Cruz Node
>   Jay@Campbell.net            got.net? PGP MIT KeyID 0xACAE1A89

Note:  Please respond via e-mail as well as or instead of posting,
as I get CP-LITE instead of the whole list.

   --John Kelsey, jmkelsey@delphi.com
 PGP 2.6 fingerprint = 4FE2 F421 100F BB0A 03D1 FE06 A435 7E36

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMJm0AUHx57Ag8goBAQGHTAP/XCsTUjb26sLB+UORMQCNjtBz2dhCjcF2
QkKfRjuUcBOG3z/nCeLDgfb1hWiiSYJwRhJOTG0dCcqS9k9gO//hpC4CsDz3y0Yw
mt5sG4X6POB+ljBfFOHqM7joekLmnmbodZQYdmiFTHbZ/Zn4w4obrTRjcPKhlQH9
Fctxd8JCYyg=
=ITxA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----