1995-11-28 - Re: The future will be easy to use

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Jonathan Zamick <JonathanZ@consensus.com>
Message Hash: ada13fa9a5e21d716b4b2a93bcb768e31226b4fcd4d6c933b54cd43b083c219d
Message ID: <199511281726.MAA00314@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <v02120d00ace0f66694dc@[157.22.240.13]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-28 18:11:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 02:11:06 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 02:11:06 +0800
To: Jonathan Zamick <JonathanZ@consensus.com>
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
In-Reply-To: <v02120d00ace0f66694dc@[157.22.240.13]>
Message-ID: <199511281726.MAA00314@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jonathan Zamick writes:
> I can't agree. The model of a successful enterprise includes feedback from
> different levels of participants.

This isn't an enterprise. The government is not a participant except
by their own desire to interfere.

> Regardless, the government will be taking a role in encryption.

What makes you say that? Besides, why would that be desirable on any
level?

The Government will try to set standards and we will ignore them until
they try to force them on us by law, period.

Perry





Thread