1995-11-28 - Re: The future will be easy to use (fwd)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: stevenw@best.com (Steven Weller)
Message Hash: b619a6e48aab3ae9efed3b4a81dfeb5946605e187d63a5060c3bbc693bc0fed5
Message ID: <199511281329.IAA13468@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <v01530506ace05744708d@[206.86.1.35]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-28 19:45:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 03:45:22 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 03:45:22 +0800
To: stevenw@best.com (Steven Weller)
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <v01530506ace05744708d@[206.86.1.35]>
Message-ID: <199511281329.IAA13468@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Steven Weller writes:
> >Realisticaly, who in their right mind would buy a diskless workstation to
> >connect to Internet?
> 
> The same sort of things could be said of the telephone compared with
> written correspondence. Why would anyone have one in their business or
> home? Anyone can overhear a conversation, people will just chat, the only
> thing you can do with it is talk, there is no record of the correspondence,
> why would anyone want to talk to people on the other side of town? etc.

This is different. In an era of distributed processing, they are
returning you to the mainframe model. I don't see that this can work
very well. Considering how much more powerful a $1000 machine is, why
would you want something half that price that can do one hundredth as
much for you?

Perry





Thread