1995-11-14 - Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.

Header Data

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
To: Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
Message Hash: c98ed4c39c1abd9448c35e5a6a8d176c67d9862b13ff7fb394b7fe047f359b33
Message ID: <199511142038.PAA07035@universe.digex.net>
Reply To: <199511141758.MAA14695@jafar.sware.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-14 20:55:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:55:41 +0800

Raw message

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:55:41 +0800
To: Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
Subject: Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
In-Reply-To: <199511141758.MAA14695@jafar.sware.com>
Message-ID: <199511142038.PAA07035@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jeff Barber writes:
>Does anyone know the ostensible justification for this?  What section of
>the ITARs do they point to when they say "this is illegal"?  I've perused
>an online copy of ITAR (no, I haven't read all of it -- I have other
>things I want to do this year :-), but I can't find a section that could
>be construed to support this contention.

I think it's 121.1, Category XIII paragraph (b) item (5):
"Ancillary equipment specifically designed or modified for paragraphs (b)
(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) of this category;"





Thread