From: Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cab6cb9c1da2a6cc323d57f5516e7fec81a01fec3b15728601950274f019352c
Message ID: <199511211546.JAA04806@galil.austnsc.tandem.com>
Reply To: <199511210955.BAA16150@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-21 16:27:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:27:09 +0800
From: Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:27:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Junk E-Mail"
In-Reply-To: <199511210955.BAA16150@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <199511211546.JAA04806@galil.austnsc.tandem.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com said:
a> On Mon, 20 Nov 1995 hallam@w3.org wrote:
>> I think it would be better to slap a RICO suit onto the company
>> concerned. It sound to me like an attempt to gain financial advantage
>> through threatening behaviour. Where I come from that means jail
>> time.
a> RICO is very serious stuff. Criminal prosecution under the terms of
a> the Racketeer-Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act is reserved for
a> very serious situations indeed. It's true "rubber hose" stuff.
a> It was intended as a tool for use against mobsters, but US attorneys
a> have used it against white-collar criminals. I think, you'd have to
a> have strong evidence of an ongoing "criminal enterprise", which I
a> don't think you have with junk e-mail.
Actually, they've started using it against vicious
reversed-black-collar (and non-collared) criminals for daring to
exercise their right under the first amendment to peacably protest.
--
#include <disclaimer.h> /* Sten Drescher */
To get my PGP public key, send me email with your public key and
Subject: PGP key exchange
Key fingerprint = 90 5F 1D FD A6 7C 84 5E A9 D3 90 16 B2 44 C4 F3
Return to November 1995
Return to “Sten Drescher <dreschs@mpd.tandem.com>”