1995-11-30 - Re: The future will be easy to use

Header Data

From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
To: “P. Rajaram” <rajaram@morgan.com>
Message Hash: d5648f807bf7891150a4a863a76c04c3947a0e7958e95d2351732eb63361349d
Message ID: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951130174443.7762B-100000@usr3.primenet.com>
Reply To: <9511300751.ZM7630@morgan.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-30 18:46:01 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 02:46:01 +0800

Raw message

From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 02:46:01 +0800
To: "P. Rajaram" <rajaram@morgan.com>
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
In-Reply-To: <9511300751.ZM7630@morgan.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSD.3.91.951130174443.7762B-100000@usr3.primenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 30 Nov 1995, P. Rajaram wrote:

> On Nov 29, 10:25pm, attila wrote:
> > Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
> >    OK, I have not seen it (like I said, I will get it) or read ipsec.
> >
> >    However, despite the group ego, Sun _does_ listen and Sun does wish to
> > be the leader. If the rest of ipsec group has a specific list, maybe it
> > needs to presented higher up the pole.
> 
> There are different groups within Sun.
> The people pushing SKIP don't talk much with the group building IPv6.
>
   that's a given. NIBM (not invented by ME) syndrome.  That is what 
needs to stop. however, Sun has been playing the game recently of 
introducing an early product, then coming on with a more standard product.

   that does not change the fact the twogroups need to talk, and someone 
needs to coordiante resources.  Nothing wrong if SKIP shakes out a few 
details as they implement, but then it needs to go to the standards.





Thread