From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: David A Wagner <daw@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Message Hash: d7baf25784a939f49403592ff17cf63a8b3eb95f02522df0031e71598fa86677
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951112224949.24714A-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <199511122243.OAA18565@delhi.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-13 07:48:34 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 15:48:34 +0800
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 15:48:34 +0800
To: David A Wagner <daw@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: Diffie-Hellman in GF(2^n)?
In-Reply-To: <199511122243.OAA18565@delhi.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951112224949.24714A-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> I don't know enough about number theory to judge for myself;
> but you can read the (long) paper yourself at
>
> ftp://netlib.att.com/netlib/att/math/odlyzko/discrete.logs.ps.Z
Thanks for the reference. The paper gives a running time of exp(c(n
log n)^(1/2)) for discrete log in GF(p) and exp(c*n^(1/3)*(log n)^(2/3))
for discrete log in GF(2^n). However, this paper was published in 1985.
There is now an algorithm to calculate discrete logs in GF(p) in
exp(c*n^(1/3)*(log n)^(2/3)) (see prime.discrete.logs.ps.Z in the same
directory), so perhaps GF(2^n) isn't so bad after all.
Wei Dai
Return to November 1995
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”