From: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: d821423722ff3f8d2023c7ec9c0c0e9ff04fe1cc061c6ce2ba65aa00dc658324
Message ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.951103090838.4011B-100000@nic.wat.hookup.net>
Reply To: <acbf02ca0402100496c4@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-03 14:36:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 22:36:37 +0800
From: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 22:36:37 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: video as a source of public randomness
In-Reply-To: <acbf02ca0402100496c4@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.951103090838.4011B-100000@nic.wat.hookup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Would not generating random numbers using video sources be
suseptable to the same 'external' influences as generating random numbers
from radio static? External RF fields could skew the 'randomness' of the
data.
As another thought, has anyone done any work on RNGs involving
chaotic processes such as fluid dynamics and turbulent flow? I suspect
that pressure, or other parameter variences, in turbulent flow could yield
good random numbers. As a bonus, these parameters are easily measurable
without special, exotic, equipment and should be inexpensive
Regards, Tim Philp
===================================
For PGP Public Key, Send E-mail to:
pgp-public-keys@swissnet.ai.mit.edu
In Subject line type:
GET PHILP
===================================
Return to November 1995
Return to “Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>”