From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
To: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Message Hash: dd611cd1f1892b49df15be433a776c3864537918773097fcecfdb824e841d252
Message ID: <acdf958f00021004c3b1@DialupEudora>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-27 17:23:55 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 01:23:55 +0800
From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 01:23:55 +0800
To: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: Elliptic curves, current status?
Message-ID: <acdf958f00021004c3b1@DialupEudora>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 9:48 PM 11/26/95, Wei Dai wrote:
....
>The IEEE p1363 group's working draft on elliptic curve standard may help
>you here. You can find it at ftp://ftp.rsa.com/pub/p1363/draft/ec.ps
>
>One reason for confusion about the speed of elliptic curve cryptosystems is
>the small number of implementations. A paper in Crypto 95 claimed that
>for doing key exchange, an elliptic curve algorithm takes about the same
>time and has about the same level of security as DH with 512 bit modulus,
>and that elliptic curve has a speed advantage if greater security is
>desired.
>
>Wei Dai
Thanks much! I will look at the paper.
Return to November 1995
Return to “norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)”
1995-11-27 (Tue, 28 Nov 1995 01:23:55 +0800) - Re: Elliptic curves, current status? - norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)