1995-11-27 - ETH_ic?

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dea1b159637b8e28bfbfaab31c1d6c832258aff5f91ebe6603755513ecc7215e
Message ID: <199511271435.JAA05550@pipe1.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-27 14:44:40 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 22:44:40 +0800

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 22:44:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: ETH_ic?
Message-ID: <199511271435.JAA05550@pipe1.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   11-27-95. NYPaper:

   "An Intel computer security expert runs afoul of the law.
   So much for the 'hacker ethic'?"

      Regardless of whether one sees Randal Schwartz as a
      white knight with questionable judgment or a computer
      criminal who deserves jail time, his tale contains
      valuable lessons for anyone who uses or manages a
      corporate computer system. On the Internet, computer
      programmers and systems administrators have debated
      whether Mr. Schwartz was a hero or a criminal. The
      on-line jury is divided. Most concluded that he was
      guilty of poor judgment, not criminal intent. Some say
      the case has killed the hacker ethic. "If I saw someone
      on the Internet with a security weakness, at this point
      I would be reluctant to act the Good Samaritan and
      report it," said Jeffrey Kegler, an independent software
      consultant in Sunnyvale Calif. "If I saw weakness in
      Intel's machine, I'd keep it to myself."

   ETH_ic?  (7 kb)














Thread