1995-11-22 - Re: MED_vac

Header Data

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
To: “Thomas M. Swiss” <tms@tis.com>
Message Hash: f72983bd4cb780910fff72d667c0be1176e9fbad3cce00301b1cdc6a4d8d777a
Message ID: <199511222108.QAA10547@universe.digex.net>
Reply To: <199511152004.PAA05104@ziggy.tis.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-22 21:53:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 05:53:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 05:53:42 +0800
To: "Thomas M. Swiss" <tms@tis.com>
Subject: Re: MED_vac
In-Reply-To: <199511152004.PAA05104@ziggy.tis.com>
Message-ID: <199511222108.QAA10547@universe.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"Thomas M. Swiss" writes:
>     A (possibly stupid) thought: could commercial key escrow help here?
>
>     I very much want hospitals to have fast access to my medical data if
>my broken and bleeding body should come through their door, even if I am
>unconscious and my personal physician cannot be reached. On the other hand,
>I don't want anyone to be snooping through them right now.

Actually, Bell Labs outlines a system which can preserve anonymity
under these circumstances in "The Use of Communications Networks to
Increase Personal Privacy In a Health Insurance Architecture" at
<URL:ftp://ftp.research.att.com/dist/anoncc/privacy.health.ps.Z>.

It's based on their anonymous credit card protocol, which is really a
sort of identity escrow service managed by a remailer.  You might find
it interesting.





Thread