From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: fdb1258e88bffb80673d34db55b51133b4c838f34f632cb13c70714a0afe861a
Message ID: <199511301622.IAA08684@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-30 16:46:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:46:17 +0800
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:46:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: The future will be easy to use
Message-ID: <199511301622.IAA08684@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Jon Lasser writes:
>> However, if you have optional linking of ID and name, shippers will only
>> ship to keys with such attributes. Because just ID and address, it could
>> be a "hit and run" type attack shipped to a safe maildrop.
At 03:19 AM 11/30/95 -0500, Futplex wrote:
>People who steal credit cards prefer to order goods to be delivered somewhere
>they can grab them.
Presumably all of us seek a ecash and echeque system somewhat better
than a human readable sixteen decimal digit number:
Indeed, what I had in mind was 1024 binary bit number -- we should be
working to a world in which a self generated secret PGP key performs the
functions that a credit card number does today.
(Often this is just the front of the rightful owner's
>home, while Holly the Homeowner is off at work.) But that's just another
>reason to cut down unauthorized credit card charges, not a reason to restrict
>what a rightful cardholder can do with the card. I _want_ to be able to have
>stuff delivered to arbitrary locations, and I _don't_ want to give that up
>just to make it tough on thieves.
>
>James Donald writes:
>> This argument makes no sense at all: I am going to attack my
>> enemies by paying people to send books, computers, and stuff
>> to them?
>
>Ordering hardcore porno videos to be sent to, say, somewhere in Tennessee
>might work pretty well in our sadly repressed society.
>
>-Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to November 1995
Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>”
1995-11-30 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 00:46:17 +0800) - Re: The future will be easy to use - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>