From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Message Hash: 02cfcc632f189cb3e0fb6b94a316ff9efabec0ee7b9b19504520558eb41c9f30
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951215154703.12878C-100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <199512151901.UAA10562@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-16 00:18:52 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Dec 95 16:18:52 PST
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 95 16:18:52 PST
To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Subject: Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
In-Reply-To: <199512151901.UAA10562@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951215154703.12878C-100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Anonymous wrote:
> It's kind of cool how much faith you have in the idea that
> your number is unlisted, considering the fact that you started
> this thread by griping that someone had the goods on you. The
> reason you were "taken aback" is because your beliefs don't
> correspond to reality -- "cognitive dissonance," in the lingo.
1) I have no faith in my number being unlisted, I merely
mentioned my contractural expectation.
2) I was not griping. I was requesting information (of which
"Anonymous" is apparently bereft).
3) Being "taken aback" refers to surprise (look it up). Far
from the meaning of "cognitive dissonance."
"Assuming facts not in evidence," in the lingo.
So what DO you know, "Anonyomous"?
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Return to December 1995
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”