From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Message Hash: 03ecd115c88475d65761395fbe8742bce3ba2eaeeddaf7cc34fdbccf75e42c5c
Message ID: <199512042005.MAA04678@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <9512041705.AA25255@sulphur.osf.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-04 20:14:04 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 12:14:04 PST
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 12:14:04 PST
To: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
Subject: Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
In-Reply-To: <9512041705.AA25255@sulphur.osf.org>
Message-ID: <199512042005.MAA04678@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
It doesn't appear that these people seem to care about
cash-like anonymous token-based payment schemes. Is that a valid
assesment? What is needed to make these people start caring about
that?
>
> ---------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------
> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 22:43:46 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Debbie O'Dell" <dlo@dsunix2.dsrd.ornl.gov>
> To: Electronic Commerce Working Group Reflector <fstc-ecomm@monroe.llnl.gov>
> Subject: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment Standard
--
sameer Voice: 510-601-9777
Community ConneXion FAX: 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Return to December 1995
Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”