1995-12-09 - Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus?

Header Data

From: Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 09f752d0a40578963b9127d87a099ce72a4a42c8c93fcdcc64f88d1de0b545f6
Message ID: <199512090351.TAA29699@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-09 03:50:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 19:50:37 PST

Raw message

From: Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 19:50:37 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus?
Message-ID: <199512090351.TAA29699@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Just an idea. It would be huge, but can anyone think of a reason it would not
be technically feasible?

Also, does NT use the same algorithm for saving network passwords?

-rich

Thread

• Return to December 1995

• Return to “Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”

• 1995-12-09 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 19:50:37 PST) - Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus? - Richard Charles Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>