From: “Ed Carp” <ecarp@netcom.com>
To: Matt Miszewski <crypto@midex.com>
Message Hash: 1cc3657f01367c7219380a82633bbb4cc019a16ab4fa53df59afea617cf74226
Message ID: <199512010750.BAA18796@khijol>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-02 16:27:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 00:27:17 +0800
From: "Ed Carp" <ecarp@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 00:27:17 +0800
To: Matt Miszewski <crypto@midex.com>
Subject: Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
Message-ID: <199512010750.BAA18796@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 04:40:23 -36000
> From: Matt Miszewski <crypto@midex.com>
> Subject: Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
> To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
> Cc: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>, cypherpunks@toad.com,
> jsw@tera.netscape.com
> On Thu, 30 Nov 1995, sameer wrote:
>
> > Jeff: If Netscape comes out in favor of GAK, will you leave?
> > (Wait until February, at least, of course..) You don't have to answer
> > that to me, or the list, just think about it, and answer it for
> > yourself. Do you think "anyone else" there would leave, as you say
> > below that they don't want to go down history, etc...
> >
>
> While this would go over well in the press if handled right please let
> everyone remember that Jeff is a real person with bills to pay and food
> to put on at least his own table. Now if someone out there with their
> own business is willing to match his politics with his purse and offer
> Jeff a job at the same level if he *decides* to leave in the midst of GAK
> flak...
If Jeff decided to leave, I don't think he'd have much trouble
getting something else - I'd be surprised if he wasn't employed the
next day.
Of course, if Jeff's got any stock in Netscape, he'd be nuts to leave
- unless he values his principles more than he values his stock. No
insult intended.
Return to December 1995
Return to ““Ed Carp” <ecarp@netcom.com>”
1995-12-02 (Sun, 3 Dec 1995 00:27:17 +0800) - Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow - “Ed Carp” <ecarp@netcom.com>