From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
To: dan@milliways.org
Message Hash: 1e48142f44d8541ffe26381369fafb02c6be79e8b2ad8d4bb49fced7c1465aa3
Message ID: <199512160034.QAA15353@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: <199512152338.XAA22526@pop01.ny.us.ibm.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-16 10:57:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 18:57:12 +0800
From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 18:57:12 +0800
To: dan@milliways.org
Subject: Re: Motorola Secure Phone
In-Reply-To: <199512152338.XAA22526@pop01.ny.us.ibm.net>
Message-ID: <199512160034.QAA15353@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
My AT&T 900 (or is it 9000?) MHz digital cordless phone says
the same thing. I figure it uses a weak cryptosystem. There is
something about key setup when you return the handset to the base.
(The phone was $200, FWIW)
>
>
> I saw a new cordless phone made by Motorola in a retail outlet today
> that is supposedly "Secure from eavesdroppers." I asked the
> salespeople for more technical info, but they weren't very helpful.
> Does anyone have any information on this? I didn't notice any "Not
> for Export" stickers on the box, and the ITAR does cover
> spread-spectrum technology. So is it analog or digital? Is it just
> doing simple analog tricks, or is it encrypting a bitstream? Clipper
> maybe? I doubt it. Any info appreciated.
> Dan
>
> ***************************************************************
> #define private public dan@milliways.org
> Worcester Polytechnic Institute and The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
> ***************************************************************
>
--
sameer Voice: 510-601-9777
Community ConneXion FAX: 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org
Return to December 1995
Return to “Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>”