From: “Ed Carp” <ecarp@netcom.com>
To: Frank Stuart <loki@obscura.com
Message Hash: 2919758695595c0578fbdc54082c909a57eaa3888f8123021c10712fd84db01f
Message ID: <199512010744.BAA18327@khijol>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-01 07:43:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:43:46 +0800
From: "Ed Carp" <ecarp@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:43:46 +0800
To: Frank Stuart <loki@obscura.com
Subject: Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
Message-ID: <199512010744.BAA18327@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 21:43:57 -0600 (CST)
> From: Frank Stuart <fstuart@vetmed.auburn.edu>
> To: loki@obscura.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
> >If he has not clarified his position by tomorrow evening, I will set up some
> >web pages explaining the situation and decrying Netscape's apparent
> >position on key escrow (GAK). I have the quotes that L. McCarthy posted,
> >and Jeff Weinstein's response. I have not been able to get the article off
> >the server yet (possible all the cypherpunks downloading it?). Any other
> >documents I should include?
>
> I'm working on an "obnoxify" program to convert normal html documents into
> documents that look normal to non-netscape browsers, but are too painful to
> read with netscape (</BLINK>, <FONT SIZE=1>, etc.). I think tomorrow evening
> would be a good time to decide whether or not to distribute it.
The only problem with this approach is that this will bite other
browsers that have started supporting the so-called "Netscape
extensions". More than one person has coded the Netscape stuff into
their pages because it gives the author more flexibility than the
standard 1.0/2.0 standards. And there aren't many browsers out there
yet that support 3.0.
Return to December 1995
Return to ““Ed Carp” <ecarp@netcom.com>”
1995-12-01 (Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:43:46 +0800) - Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech - “Ed Carp” <ecarp@netcom.com>