From: ecarp@tssun5.dsccc.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2ae0ee2bc0861ff5cc1bc2a2df0db5ebd9eeb0ef5ed902d209b7d0a3faadb770
Message ID: <9512272351.AA27795@tssun5.>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-29 07:50:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 15:50:17 +0800
From: ecarp@tssun5.dsccc.com
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 15:50:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
Message-ID: <9512272351.AA27795@tssun5.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> From owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Wed Dec 27 17:48 CST 1995
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 16:51:41 -0500
> Subject: Employer Probing Precedents?
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> From: "Jason D. Livingood/WSC"@hks.net
> X-Server-Version: Cactus-Serv 1.5
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> To Whom It May Concern:
>
> I was curious as to where I might find some electronic freedom legal
> precedents. If, for example, an employer was planning to probe file systems on
> PCs in the off-hours and employees began encrypting their hard drives, what
> legal precedents would support the employees or would support the employer in
> blocking the encryption?
Try www.eff.org.
I have a partition on my HD that is routinely encrypted. When asked about it,
my response was that I was acting to protect company confidential material
and company assets.
Return to December 1995
Return to “ecarp@tssun5.dsccc.com”
1995-12-29 (Fri, 29 Dec 1995 15:50:17 +0800) - Re: Employer Probing Precedents? - ecarp@tssun5.dsccc.com