From: “Ed Carp (ecarp@netcom.com)” <khijol!netcom.com!ecarp@cygnus.com>
To: khijol!ix.netcom.com!stewarts@cygnus.com
Message Hash: 35fc7efbc85a382ba7d67d4ced4a01dd407344c000b76e69cc72afef6afc04c9
Message ID: <199512112018.OAA11102@khijol>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-12 06:27:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 14:27:46 +0800
From: "Ed Carp (ecarp@netcom.com)" <khijol!netcom.com!ecarp@cygnus.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 14:27:46 +0800
To: khijol!ix.netcom.com!stewarts@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] GAK and self-incrimination?
Message-ID: <199512112018.OAA11102@khijol>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 09:01:40 -0500
> To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
> Subject: Re: [NOISE] GAK and self-incrimination?
> From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> If I'm not guilty why do I want strong crypto? Sometimes for the same
> reason I want a shredder. And why do I want a shredder? Sometimes just to
> keep the local gossip from going through my papers after I throw them out.
Another, not-so-obvious reason to encrypt stuff, especially stuff
that goes out over the net, is that folks can suck your email off the
net and gather all sorts of useful information. This has all kinds
of annoying implications, especially for people who gather
demographics and other data for constructing email lists for sale.
-- short ed
Return to December 1995
Return to ““Ed Carp (ecarp@netcom.com)” <khijol!netcom.com!ecarp@cygnus.com>”
1995-12-12 (Tue, 12 Dec 1995 14:27:46 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] GAK and self-incrimination? - “Ed Carp (ecarp@netcom.com)” <khijol!netcom.com!ecarp@cygnus.com>