1995-12-03 - Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave…

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3f9105587ca443b65ac273c66a84479c4942be8a66cec771d6285abe73da56ae
Message ID: <30C162DD.1E2F@netscape.com>
Reply To: <ace5cd0216021004c8fd@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-03 09:02:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 17:02:53 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 17:02:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
In-Reply-To: <ace5cd0216021004c8fd@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <30C162DD.1E2F@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Black Unicorn wrote:
> I just get sick of those who tout themselves as Experts in Software
> Munitions and are in fact are merely in it for the cash.  In it for the
> cash is just fine.  Just don't tell me later you aren't.

  Can't I be a supporter of strong crypto, and also be in it for the money?
Many people here make good money off of crypto related work.  If I'm asked
to implement GAK in a situation where it is not mandated by law, I won't
do it.

> > I read the Jim Clark statement that Jeff forwarded. It seemed noncomittal
> > on the actual issue of whether Netscape will build a U.S.-supported GAK (as
> > opposed to offering GAK for the Iraqis or French). I await with interest
> > the clarification of the anti-GAK stance that Jeff alluded to.
> 
> I believe you got it with:
> 
> "If the law requires GAK, then I believe that we will implement it rather
> than just disable encryption."

  Tim was referring to the position statement against GAK that we will be
releasing before the NIST meeting next week.

> Note that the phrase is entirely ambigious on whether this refers to the
> law requiring GAK for export, or export AND domestic sales.  Netscape
> will install GAK into whatever will increase its sales.  I understand
> and respect this position in the context of a company which needs
> badly to start raking in some profits.

  What I meant, and have said in other places, is that if it is legal to
ship a product without GAK for use inside the US, or anywhere else,
I believe we will do it, because that is what our customers want.

> The title "Software Munitions Expert" or similar such should probably be
> changed to "GAK marketing expert" however.

  I'm sorry my dig at the ITAR does not ammuse you.  Your suggested
replacement would not be appropriate since I don't support GAK (I believe
that it is one of the most evil things any government could do to its
citizens), and I'm not in marketing.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread