From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
To: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Message Hash: 3fe55518cc2b2f48f46593ce4f7ee54d931d29e4a34f30deb67c0fe1e93afc86
Message ID: <199512251933.OAA14735@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-25 20:06:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 04:06:04 +0800
From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 04:06:04 +0800
To: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Subject: Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
Message-ID: <199512251933.OAA14735@pipe8.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
How about one-time electronic stamps.
I generate a large-ish number of long-ish random numbers.
I store these into a data base on my system.
I send one e-stamp to all of the people I want to communicate with and vice
versa.
Each person uses the e-stamp in the header or some other area of their
message to me easily accessible to my mail bot.
My bot reads the e-stamp and then checks the data base to see if the stamp
is valid.
If not, then /dev/null. If so, then:
a) send the message to me;
b) delete the used e-stamp from the data base;
c) send a confirmation of received message with a new e-stamp in it.
Thoughts? (I see one problem with this but it should be able to be worked
out once the basic method is agreed to).
--tallpaul
Return to December 1995
Return to “tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)”