From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 13:21:45 +0800
To: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Subject: Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951228091552.4338d-100000@goya>
Message-ID: <9512282259.AA12970@alpha>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Scott Brickner writes:
 > The notion that, simply because you're wearing a uniform owned by your
 > employer, you're subject to physical search at the employer's
 > discretion is laughable.  The difference between this and searching the
 > computer on one's desk differ only in degree, IMO.

Another vaguely-related concept is that of tenants' rights to a degree
of security in rental property.

My employer owns the workstation in front of me, but in exchange for
supplying them with software and ideas (when I'm not busy sending
e-mail to mailing lists ;-) they've "given" it to me to use in that
pursuit.  They could of course insist that I pay for it, like the old
company store model that railroad workers dealt with.  In a sense I
do pay for it, under the idea that the company would be able to pay me
more if not for the expense of the tools I need for the job.

Though the ownership==control equation works sometimes, and is
appealing to reason, I don't think things are always so simple.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Nobody's going to listen to you if you just | Mike McNally (m5@tivoli.com) |
| stand there and flap your arms like a fish. | Tivoli Systems, Austin TX    |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~