From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 1995 19:01:01 +0800
To: Jeff Weinstein <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
Message-ID: <199512021603.IAA00950@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:01 PM 12/1/95 -0800, Jeff Weinstein wrote:
>
>  I think the gist
> of it is that if governments require key escrow, we will have to do it
> in order to sell our products with encryption into those countries.

Jim Clark wrote:
>> But if we do not come up with a solution to this problem that is
>> acceptable to each government, we will not be able to export our products,
>> except with a short key length (e.g. 40 bit keys), and that will not be
>> acceptable to corporate customers in other countries.

I read it as saying:  "Let us help the government invade the privacy
of our customers, so that the government will do us some favors in export 
licensing", rather than "Well if they stick it to us at gunpoint,
we will submit."

I would appreciate some further "clarification".

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com