From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
To: “David E. Smith” <Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 6812229635521b65c646c41442da8fe71c4c5bd178cbe371cf9de4409a29a977
Message ID: <199512160410.XAA06462@UNiX.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-16 06:07:05 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:07:05 +0800
From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:07:05 +0800
To: "David E. Smith" <Cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: The Elevator Problem
Message-ID: <199512160410.XAA06462@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 12 Dec 1995 09:11:45 -0600, David E. Smith wrote:
[..]
>The way I understand the system, in order for Alice to have Bob's key (and
>vice versa) they each have to transmit a considerable amount of data about
>their keys. Even if those data are in the form of "twenty questions," neither
>knows anything about the other's key at the start. Is there something
>painfully obvious that I'm missing?
Oddly enough, I saw this posted the same night I saw the timing-attack
against RSA announced. Is there a connection here?
If we assume a hypothetical future where the current families of
public key encryption can be easily broken, anyhow...
--Mutant Rob
Return to December 1995
Return to “wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)”
1995-12-16 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 14:07:05 +0800) - Re: The Elevator Problem - wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)