From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6aae59298473e8214b4237743a59ac678c4e8bcfdbfb0bbf8f8e7854ef79ffe4
Message ID: <199512151846.KAA14526@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-15 20:00:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:00:16 +0800
From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:00:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: And the standard continues to lower...
Message-ID: <199512151846.KAA14526@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Peter Trei wrote:
> This guy's home page is a hoot - he's into UFO contacts and dolphin
> communication.
>
> After writing to him and getting back a description of his system, it's
> clear that he's clueless. He seems to think that info sent to a vendor
> using his system can't be sorted out from the gazillion other packets
> on the Net.
>
> I described to him sniffer attacks, subverted routers, etal, and
> reccomended some basic reading (Cheswick & Bellovin,
Is this the two partners in crime from AT&T?? Cheswick & Bellovin??
I think that they're probably not all that reputable (or knowledgable)
from what I've seen of their writings and contributions to the AT&T DSRP
(Data Security Response Program) mailing list.
(If they are the same people, I mean ...)
> Kaufmann, Perlman, & Speciner, and Schneier). He said he'd
> look into it. (Yes, I know there's plenty of other attacks, such as
> OSPF spoofing, but I didn't describe them).
>
> I think we can educate this guy.
Plenty of educating can probably be done, I think.
Alice de 'nonymous ... <an455120@anon.penet.fi>
...just another one of those...
P.S. This post is in the public domain.
C. S. U. M. O. C. L. U. N. E.
Return to December 1995
Return to “anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com”
1995-12-15 (Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:00:16 +0800) - Re: And the standard continues to lower… - anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com