1995-12-21 - Digicash and capital adequacy

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 71edaf5616dcc63e67fbfbd3cc1ddff7bab9a35502deff8481c1cc2948d69e6f
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951220224506.2806B-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-21 06:56:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 22:56:02 PST

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 22:56:02 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Digicash and capital adequacy
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951220224506.2806B-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



This came out of a corridor discussion yesterday as to how digicash 
would affect future banking systems:

How does digicash interact with capital adequacy requirements? Should each
digi-dollar issued require a corresponding hunk'o'assets in the customers 
account, or should the bank be able to issue digicash using existing 
rules? Digicash can have a much faster velocity than real cash, so I can 
sort of imagine their being periods where adequacy limits could be exceeded.

What's the panels view?

Simon
 p.s.
    I got to see the movie "Hackers" while I was sick in bed after WWW 
    IV. The movie was pretty bogus, but the soundtrack was pretty 
    cool. The wonderful movie website had nothing about any soundtrack 
    albums; anyone know if there was one?
 





Thread