From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 1995 07:44:11 +0800
To: aba@atlas.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: PGP timeline FAQ... comments requested
In-Reply-To: <297.9512221337@exe.dcs.exeter.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <2QF3w8m9LgHf085yn@netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Not to belittle something that is the obvious result of painstaking work;
but I think the timeline FAQ can be improved in two general ways:

(1)  More of the specific events should be specifically dated; and

(2)  I think it would be appropriate to include a version history of PGP.  
Among other things, I think it appropriate to note the distinction between
PRZ's own Bass-o-matic conventional encryption in the earliest versions and
the use of IDEA in later versions.

These comments aside, you've done an excellent job, and the facts you present
jibe well with my own understanding.

- -- 
   Alan Bostick             | SWINDON:   What will history say?
Seeking opportunity to      | BURGOYNE:  History, sir, will tell lies as usual.
develop multimedia content. |    George Bernard Shaw, THE DEVIL'S DISCIPLE
Finger abostick@netcom.com for more info and PGP public key

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMNxVXeVevBgtmhnpAQHJ1QMAmkcQCxoXN5RW4TaviA6yN8BG4aKF2kHh
98/+2WJDrht15SBNna7M1cclT3k0nb4bY2gTIQpCi080vw6tZVhYMRs+lvBjgbLm
7lGyDvdAzAr6azliI6DKwrL7n8aflRiB
=dPNR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----