1995-12-21 - Re: ex encrypted script

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: andr0id@midwest.net (Jason Rentz)
Message Hash: 763db19e00f495b9705a93dd5ecdcc1ca343b78d215e24338577115512775fc7
Message ID: <199512210039.TAA24305@homeport.org>
Reply To: <199512202339.RAA05220@cdale1.midwest.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-21 00:35:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 16:35:58 PST

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 16:35:58 PST
To: andr0id@midwest.net (Jason Rentz)
Subject: Re: ex encrypted script
In-Reply-To: <199512202339.RAA05220@cdale1.midwest.net>
Message-ID: <199512210039.TAA24305@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Jason Rentz wrote:

| Forgive me if this is a stupid question.

Hmmm.  Will you pay us?

| I'm using AT&T unix Version 5 release 3.2.2  ( UNIX System V/386 Release 3.2)
[...]

| Is there a way to encrypt a script yet still allow it to be runnable?  I
| know that the simple answer is to write it in C and compile it but I don't
| have the means of doing that at the moment.  (i.e. there is not compiler on
| the system)
| 
| I thought of a few simple protections but they all involve decrypting before
| running.

	Ever hear of chmod?  chown?
Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume





Thread