From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 95 11:01:53 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
Message-ID: <199512151900.LAA15457@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Alice de 'nonymous wrote:

> Can anyone tell me whether Ian Goldberg and David Wagner got their $25,000
> from Netscape for finding the HUGE security flaws in Netscape's existing 
> product line??
>
> Alice de 'nonymous ...               <an455120@anon.penet.fi>
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Heh, hey Alice, you know this discussion a short time ago where you
claimed that you wouldn't use PGP for signing because it wasn't secure
or something, what's with the use of the penet address?

Surely a penet address offers even less protection for your id?

Or have you done something nifty like create the penet address with a
nymserver address?

(the real)

Alice de 'nonymous ...

                                  ...just another one of those...


P.S.  This post is in the public domain.
                  C.  S.  U.  M.  O.  C.  L.  U.  N.  E.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMNHFeIbu8OQjKS7RAQFsmAP/SKKz7XCVmTxUQhLL+IEQaleMaTgp+rCO
GAsCDcESY6DBDd3NLR07fkNxZufGxyTFqOeL8SFlH5fMGYvwuLrytLwc9guqkr5I
aAXiq+hz13GHhoCkr0SnK+ti1M8ERj8EwTvyUWHnUy4b3Nb4K8oD0OzgZwcHVMkP
jvdsCUnQQfo=
=z2td
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----