From: blancw@accessone.com
To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Message Hash: 9001d9967b83129ed8f779f3b4bf6127540d3326ed3ba65c9f0a3df6a443411c
Message ID: <9512210757.AA25767@pulm1.accessone.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-21 07:57:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 23:57:34 PST
From: blancw@accessone.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 23:57:34 PST
To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Subject: Re: on web standards: sent to Markoff
Message-ID: <9512210757.AA25767@pulm1.accessone.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Attila:
I'm surprised at you. I thought you were anarcho-capitalist. Oh, well; I have a
few pithy comments in reply to your post (but anything beyond this will be in
private email).
I'm tempted to say back to you, as you just recently stated: "if you have not
walked in the other's shoes, keep silent." Have you read any of the books on
Microsoft or Bill Gates? I think this would provide you with additional
perspective on your conclusions about him and the company.
But think about this:
. no company which MS has done business with has been coerced into dealing
with the company and its products. Those who felt compelled to do business on
Billg's terms were influenced by their desire to reap the lucrative benefits of
it.
. no customer has been coerced into purchasing the products offered; they
were not prevented from shopping for computers from companies which do not
pre-install the OS; if it was already installed on the machines they purchased,
they were free to delete it, they were not coerced into using it or into
upgrading to the next release.
. not only have many software companies not take advantage of the
opportunities created for cashing in on the unexpected popularity of MS
software,
. there have been occasions where competitors failed to see opportunities in
the market which Microsoft did and took aim for, or
. attempted business deals/associations among competitor software companies
did not come about, thus failing to create a concerted competitive threat to
Microsoft, or
. a dominant software product from a competitor suffered in the market place,
(sometimes from the fault of "bad management"), thus again giving the advantage
to Microsoft.
Often it has been what the competition *didn't do*, which gave Microsoft the
advantage in the "market place", rather than any amazing magical business savvy
or "unethical business practices".
Nevertheless, as someone at MS said, "it isn't the customers who are
complaining". There have been many willing participants, apparently, who have
cooperated (or "conspired", if you will) in making the company the success
which it has become. And continue to do so.
..
Blanc
p.s. Nuri-logical: I like your idea for a "dog-eat-dog" welfare fund.
Return to December 1995
Return to “blancw@accessone.com”
1995-12-21 (Wed, 20 Dec 95 23:57:34 PST) - Re: on web standards: sent to Markoff - blancw@accessone.com