From: jadestar@netcom.com (JaDe)
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: 90c375470e9fa2d9d39d6e7e342cce8fd6877dbc91ce1e1db176a519b6d2bdbf
Message ID: <199512160052.QAA04337@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199512152102.NAA27308@netcom19.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-16 05:17:13 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 13:17:13 +0800
From: jadestar@netcom.com (JaDe)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 13:17:13 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: "Strongly Voluntary" Key Escrow
In-Reply-To: <199512152102.NAA27308@netcom19.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199512160052.QAA04337@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>
> At 9:10 12/15/95 -0500, Jim Ray wrote:
> >"Government Key Certification" might be an OK compromise-term compared
> >to "key escrow," but we should [IMNSHO] continue to stick to "GAK." As
> >you know, I prefered the term "FUCKED," but now we must be "decent" in
> >our communications. <sigh>
>
> I suggest Forced Key Deposit (FKD) (when some non-governmental entity e.g.
> an employer forces you to send copies of your keys to some depository), and
> Voluntary Key Deposit (VKD), when you chose to deposit a copy of your key
> with some third party. I love the way GAK sounds, so I support it even the
> whole concept is really FUCKED. Whenever I hear, "Government Key
Bill,
You may really have something here. Let's recommend a
Forced Universal Cryptographic Key and Engine Depository.
When they, naturally, build the acronym -- they'll have
spelled out the situation clearly <g>
Return to December 1995
Return to “jadestar@netcom.com (JaDe)”