1995-12-07 - Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon

Header Data

From: “Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 91041e778549b02dc4be24b2c79f4cacede87e15216b8ac9a3f944b909db7034
Message ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951207115227.11932B-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Reply To: <01HYHWSWQVWG9S3RQJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-07 17:53:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Dec 95 09:53:12 PST

Raw message

From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 95 09:53:12 PST
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
In-Reply-To: <01HYHWSWQVWG9S3RQJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.951207115227.11932B-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wed, 6 Dec 1995, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:

>    The agreement makes it all but certain that if legislation overhauling
>    the nation's telecommunications laws is enacted, it will contain some
>    of the most sweeping anti-smut provisions ever imposed on computer
                               ^^^^
>    communications.
>    
>    The plan is part of negotiations on a larger telecommunications bill
>    and settles differences among House members who were deeply divided
>    over how to best limit children's exposure to smut carried on computer
                                                   ^^^^
>    services, including the global network, Internet.

(rest of biased language deleted to keep my lunch down.  Suffice it to 
say that "smut" is such a loaded term than it's a wonder anyone can see 
anything withing the framework of the constitution.)

>    Indecent speech, unlike obscenity, is protected under the First
>    Amendment. Though the House plan doesn't yet specifically define
>    "indecent," the standard legal and regulatory definition says it is
>    material that describes in terms patently offensive, as measured by
>    contemporary community standard, sexual or excretory activities or
>    organ.

That's obscenity folks.  That _is_ legally defined. (Miller, wasn't it?)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: PGP Signed with PineSign 2.2

iQCVAwUBMMcOhDokqlyVGmCFAQGRAAP+MUoTEogvkbpsjRhJKpfPkBgieXyY5atn
piD13JM/2Ev3cW3tj+HrxSUayb1n3jfXuu5wyVAC8ZFtjEHSKENALGt1ND7D8vQu
ZjdIohX+aK6BzT924GUlB0hGmoqPDUD7loz45/rYvtlJUt7HKnZHdniDgVsadvuG
T2mtD05dg9c=
=w5Q9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
____           Robert A. Hayden      <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
\  /__     Finger for Geek Code Info <=>    Finger for PGP Public Key
 \/  /           -=-=-=-=-=-                      -=-=-=-=-=-
   \/        http://krypton.mankato.msus.edu/~hayden/Welcome.html

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GED/J d-- s:++>: a-- C++(++++)$ ULUO++ P+>+++ L++ !E---- W+(---) N+++ o+
K+++ w+(---) O- M+$>++ V-- PS++(+++)>$ PE++(+)>$ Y++ PGP++ t- 5+++ X++
R+++>$ tv+ b+ DI+++ D+++ G+++++>$ e++$>++++ h r-- y+**
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------






Thread