1995-12-08 - Re: the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: sameer <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 97734d1ec2e5aee8a12b14fc14345baf3f63dcc5e556acf60aed7192f0997b82
Message ID: <9512081603.AA02769@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <199512080630.WAA17998@infinity.c2.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-08 16:02:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 08:02:45 PST

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 08:02:45 PST
To: sameer <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard
In-Reply-To: <199512080630.WAA17998@infinity.c2.org>
Message-ID: <9512081603.AA02769@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>The chair of the working group seems interesting
>in including anonymous token-based payment systems in the standard, "I
>see no reason, other than interest, for the group to avoid
>non-account-based payment systems, to complement the account-based
>payment systems that we are now in the process of standardizing."

I see a damn good reason. X.9 is meant to be fast tracking credit card
payment mechanisms. They are not meant to be going out solving every problem in 
the universe. They could attempt to standardise non account payment systems 
after they have done the problem they were given. 

	Phill




Thread