1995-12-28 - Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Adam Shostack <tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Message Hash: 99002a4594a44dcba66093e34a432db5d7a47bad8dc00e5ea48cb93bc21812cf
Message ID: <199512270801.AAA11744@netcom9.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-28 16:53:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:53:23 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 00:53:23 +0800
To: Adam Shostack <tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Subject: Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
Message-ID: <199512270801.AAA11744@netcom9.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 14:53 12/25/95 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
>        The basic problem is that (personal) spam is a social, not a
>technical problem.  If someone wants to annoy you via the internet,
>they can do so.  You can raise the cost of their annoying you, but you
>need to be careful not to make it difficult to talk to you.

It seems to me that one of the technical problems of the personal spam is
the way it can grow into a denial of service attack on your system.  If it
takes you more horsepower to filter the spam than it takes to generate it,
then you are particulary vunerable.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz                   Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506                 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com             Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread