1995-12-06 - re: Secret Clearance

Header Data

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
To: “Robert A. Rosenberg” <hal9001@panix.com>
Message Hash: b1f2642bc3bb911150ff40aa87215238fac7015f1e68bf59ed4f196e638cd29f
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951206122514.21618A-100000@dfw.net>
Reply To: <v02130506aceb035d409b@[166.84.254.3]>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-06 18:28:35 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Dec 95 10:28:35 PST

Raw message

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 95 10:28:35 PST
To: "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9001@panix.com>
Subject: re: Secret Clearance
In-Reply-To: <v02130506aceb035d409b@[166.84.254.3]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951206122514.21618A-100000@dfw.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 6 Dec 1995, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:

> The problem is that they are subject to blackmailed/bribed/subversion ONLY
> because the employer will use the info as an excuse for firing/restricting
> the employee. If someone has a "skeleton in the closet" such as being gay,
> so long as the employer does not discrimate against gays who INFORM the
> employer of their sexual orientation or if the employer does not care about
> the person being gay (ie: removes it a potential blackmail threat) there is
> no problem so far as I can see. It is only when there is something that is
> WORK RELATED which would affect the person's performance if not known that
> the question of a background check is relevant.

	Thats not compleately true. He may not care that his employer know
that he is gay, but he would not anything for say his old mother and father
not to know. You cant never be sure about what people *really* care about.

Aleph One / aleph1@dfw.net
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5 
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01 






Thread