From: "Jeff Hupp" <jhupp@novellnet.gensys.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 14:58:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Got a subpoena?"
Message-ID: <26C7BF95B31@Novellnet.Gensys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 30 Nov 95 at 12:56, Jay Campbell wrote:

: >> "finessing" laws will become more important.  In short, they WILL have
: >> a subpoena--then what?
: >
: >	Then they'll find out that I don't have any information that
: >could help them, anyway.
: 
: What about a court order to (a) start comprehensive logging, and (b) not
: tell anyone under penalty of ______ .

	And at that point, you shut down the remailer and log each and every 
bounce.

	Now, they could get an order forcing you to run a remailer ~ but that 
would open up a whole new can of worms i.e. can you be forced, under 
court order, to commit a crime?

-- 
JHupp@gensys.com           |For PGP Public Key:
http://gensys.com          |finger jhupp@gensys.com
Autocracy is based on the assumption that one man is wiser
than a million men.  How's that again?  I missed something.