From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
To: sameer@c2.org
Message Hash: defb993c4e341f96e0b8169e9bc80e49f7380b92caaf1c112b058db57212e8ec
Message ID: <01HYF4D3MY5S9S3PZW@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-05 00:05:32 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 16:05:32 PST
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 95 16:05:32 PST
To: sameer@c2.org
Subject: Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
Message-ID: <01HYF4D3MY5S9S3PZW@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"sameer@c2.org" "sameer" 4-DEC-1995 15:47:39.33
It doesn't appear that these people seem to care about
cash-like anonymous token-based payment schemes. Is that a valid
assesment? What is needed to make these people start caring about
that?
-----------------
I doubt that anyone from a CC company is going to have much enthusiasm
for anonymous payment methods. One way in which they (and the credit bureaus,
of course) make money is via the information they can gain from credit card
usage.
-Allen
Return to December 1995
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>”
1995-12-05 (Mon, 4 Dec 95 16:05:32 PST) - Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>