From: floyddb@alpha.c2.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e1e02c66e380228d130bd1217acf90152d2bf7892ee953519a91fa4bddc7c14b
Message ID: <199512220241.SAA14531@infinity.c2.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-22 03:07:52 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Dec 95 19:07:52 PST
From: floyddb@alpha.c2.org
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 95 19:07:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <199512220241.SAA14531@infinity.c2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
andr0id@midwest.net (Jason Rentz) wrote:
>>
>>Whats the current thinking on the security level of 900Mhz digital spread
>>sectrum cordless phones? Clearly it's not a basic scanner job but how much
>>more equipment is needed to monitor one ?
>
>Well when you listen into a spread spectrum conversation what you will hear
>is open squelch white noise. The spread spectrum radios that I know about
>send information on several deffrent frequencies throughout the
>conversation.
[snip]
> Dr0id
>
>
>( Computer Consulting & Management )
>(P.O. Box 421 Cambria, IL 62915-0421)
>
[snip]
There is a company called Optoelectronics that markets a radio reciever
called the Interceptor. This is a broad band (several hundred MHz)
device designed to lock on to the most powerful signal around,
regardless of frequency. As supplied, it only has a rubber duck
antenna, but a broadband, directional antenna (Log Periodic?) could be
attached. There are AM and FM versions that output audio and a version
called the Scout that controls a scanner. These could have outboard
devices hung on to them to decode digital signals, record the
conversation ... all for less than $1000.
Floyd D. Barber
floyddb@alpha.c2.org
Key fingerprint:
8A 98 1F 6B 70 7A FE 24
35 D4 48 CF 9D F6 B0 91
PS Sameer, thanks for the nym.
Return to December 1995
Return to “floyddb@alpha.c2.org”
1995-12-22 (Thu, 21 Dec 95 19:07:52 PST) - No Subject - floyddb@alpha.c2.org